Should Children Need Participation Trophies - 1200 Words

Participation trophies are a widely spread topic, some people argue that children do not learn valuable life lessons by receiving participation awards. Contrarily, people argue that children need participation trophies to help fuel children’s want to do better to win first or second prize. Ashley Merryman, Betty Berdan and Parker Abate wrote three separate articles discussing participation trophies. Participation Trophies need to be done away with because of all the negative consequences that children learn from receiving these trophies. Ashley Merryman’s article, â€Å"Forget Trophies, Let Kids Know It’s O.K. to Lose† Explains that receiving a trophy for lack of achievement or effort, teaches children that failure is so unacceptable that losing can never happen. Reacting to children s failure is just as important as celebrating their success. â€Å"Children need to know that we learn the most through failure and mistakes†(Forget Trophies, Let Kids Know It’s O.K. to Lose, Ashley Merryman.) Children need to know that it is perfectly fine to lose so that they can learn from the experience. Not giving a child a trophy, and letting them lose isn’t to embarrass children, it s teaching them it takes a long time to get great at something. Making mistakes is a part of life, and we need to focus on progress and the process not necessarily the rewards and results. The best way for children to boost their self image is by developing their abilities. Ashley Merryman presents her case in anShow MoreRelatedTrophies : A Symbol Of Victory, Not Participation1549 Words   |  7 PagesTrophies: A Symbol of Victory, Not Participation Should children receive participation trophies? The issue of whether or not participation trophies should be given to both winners and losers has become very prominent in today’s society. People argue that it â€Å"creates a nation of wimps† (Priceman) by making all feel equal and taking out competition. Others debate for the same side but for different reasons such as how it makes children have low self-esteem or become narcissistic. On the other sideRead MoreParticipation Trophies For A Childs Growth And Development1383 Words   |  6 PagesIn the last couple years, society has debated if participation trophies are important in a child’s growth and development, or are they a complete waste of time. In today’s society, many children are given a participation trophy for just showing up whether they win or lose or even play. The problem in doing this is, we are giving children the idea that it doesn’t matter if you try or not, you’ll leave with a trophy at the end of the day. Giving kids the idea that they will always get somethingRead MoreEssay On Parts Of A Whole1346 Words   |  6 Pagescross the street or brush their teeth! The subjective success of giving children participation trophies is a growing trend. However, one must also represent the benefits and dangers of this subject as well when dealing with the raising of children. Participation trophies are, in the opinion of many, a very unsoundly founded practice that, despite the arguments presented such as helping with emotional health and teaching children about their commitments, is something that encourages the loss of a well-formedRead MoreThe Game Is All Tied Up767 Words   |  4 PagesHailey Turner Ms. Smith English Language Arts January 10, 1017 Participation Trophies The game is all tied up. The tiny tots soccer league is in the championship game for boys soccer. The little children are all running up and down the field determined to win and score the game winning goal. The blue team has a breakaway down the field and scores a goal leading the game by one with thirty seconds left in the game. For the rest of the time the ball is bouncing back and forth between the teams. TheRead MoreParticipation Trophies : Helpful Or Harmful?1027 Words   |  5 PagesParticipation Trophies: Helpful or Harmful? A new trend across America has risen in sports. Event officials are doling out participation trophies in massive numbers. The question is, are these participation trophies negatively changing the basic American values we treasure in these children? Yes, participation trophies are shaping a new cultural norm of entitlement and it promotes a new attitude of doing nothing, yet still being rewarded for it. This trend must be put to a halt and reversedRead MorePros And Cons Of Participation Trophies1336 Words   |  6 Pagesacross America, you see the topic of â€Å"Should children be receiving participation trophies† being brought up. The idea that all kids should get some reward for being a part of the game and helping it grow. To some, it seems like an excellent idea, but to others not as much. For example, NFL linebacker James Harrison took his children s participation trophies and gave them back to their coaches saying EARN a real trophy. Other parents believe that their children deserve to be praised and want themRead MoreShould Children Participation Trophies Or Not?1674 Words   |  7 PagesThere has been a debate on whether you should give your children participation trophies or not. In my opinion I believe that kids need to be told that they did well but not necessarily giving them trophies to represent they did a good job. The focus on giving out trophies every time someone does well will start to become meaningless after a while and then soon they will realize that they didn’t really earn it, it was just an item to make them feel good about participating. When I first startedRead MoreParticipation Awards And Its Impact On Society1345 Words   |  6 Pagessetting. Trophies used to represent a token of accomplishment. However, their value has diminished with the widespread usage of participation awards. Instead of inspiring the impressionable youth to become more skilled in a particular sport as trophies once did, these mementoes serve as a reminder to a memory rather than a symbol of true achievement. The awards are causing the youth of the world to become lazy and undriven to push themselves to accomplish their goals. The topic of participation trophiesRead MoreShould Children Unnecessary Rewards?1440 Words   |  6 PagesDo you think we give children unnecessary rewards? Giving too many incentives to kids could actually turn negative. The most talked about reward given is from participation in sports. Every player on the team receives a trophy, win or lose. This does not prepare children for the real world where they are not always going to be a winner; which could later lead to self esteem issues. The second point I’m going to talk about every parent does, and maybe even without noticing. It’s that parents practicallyRead MoreHow For Participation Can Impact Issues Of Self Esteem, Self Efficacy And Foreshadow Childrens Outcomes1839 Words   |  8 Pagesthe website, http://www.merriam-webs ter.com, â€Å"a trophy is an object (such as a large cup or sculpture) that is given as a prize for winning a competition.† By definition, a trophy should be given to an individual who is triumphant in a match. However, in today’s culture, children are receiving awards for simply participating in a sport or activity. By allowing this to happen, it raises the question if it is good or bad for children to receive trophies for not succeeding. Through different articles

Explain Kant’s Moral Argument Free Essays

Explain Kant’s Moral Argument Kant’s moral argument focuses on reason, good will, duty and the notion that we ought to strive towards moral perfection (Summum Bonum). He believes that people are ruled by a ‘moral law’. This moral law for Kant was universal and objective. We will write a custom essay sample on Explain Kant’s Moral Argument or any similar topic only for you Order Now An example of this might be seen in the wide scale agreement that murder or torture is wrong. There seems to be agreement across cultures that certain actions are intrinsically wrong. This, for Kant, suggests that there is a universal objective moral law. He believed that the highest form of goodness was the notion of good will, namely that someone would freely choose to do good for no reward whatsoever, only for the sake of goodness. Moreover, Kant believed that we have a moral duty to do such good things. He would argue that we have an awareness of what is right and wrong and that good will should make us act accordingly as reason dictates this to be the case. In a way it doesn’t make any rational sense to act in an immoral way. Duty was seen by Kant as a way of fulfilling this end without being misguided by emotion or factors of personal gain. It is here that we come to a key point in Kant’s argument, namely the notion of ‘ought’ implies ‘can’. He believed that we can only have a duty to do something that we can do. For example, I cannot have a duty to fly unaided as it is not something that I can do; or if I were to come across someone drowning in a lake but could not swim Kant would suggest that I would not have a duty to jump in and save them. My duty in the latter case would be to find someone who could swim so I would need to raise the alarm. If I can choose to do the good (using reason, good will and duty) in one case then I should be able to do this in every case, moreover that I have a duty to achieve this moral perfection. Kant called this moral perfection the Summum Bonum. He argued that the Summum Bonum was a state of moral perfection existing coincidently with perfect happiness. For Kant, the problem for human beings acting morally was that it did not lead to happiness. I could be the most moral person in the world yet personal tragedy could befall me, while another individual may lead an immoral life and be happy in some way. This would appear to make the world unfair and would potentially discourage us from acting morally at all. Kant believed that we must have a duty to achieve the Summum Bonum and because it was not achievable in this lifetime that we must be able to achieve this in the next life. Kant does not see this as ‘proof’ of God’s xistence only that it hints towards their being a higher being such as God who gives humans this sense of duty, and gives us the initiative to act morally in order to achieve perfection. The conclusion of Kant’s moral argument is that God must exist as a postulate of practical reason. Without the existence of God we cannot have the afterlife and we would not be able to fulfil our obligation of reaching the Summum Bonum. Therefore God is necessary to ensure fairness in the universe an d provide the exact coincidence of moral perfection and perfect happiness known as the Summum Bonum. How to cite Explain Kant’s Moral Argument, Essay examples

Frederic Chopin Essay Example For Students

Frederic Chopin Essay Was known to dress in mens clothing and smoke in public like men Mazurka as a genre A Polish folk dance in triple meter (first beat gets the emphasis) O But in the Mazurka its the second beat that gets the emphasis Traditionally danced to (Chopping werent danced to in the beginning) Chopin composed 69 Mazurka, 59 are published Political implications Mazurka in a-flat, pop. L no. 7 Texture O Homophobic (melody accompaniment) Melody (ABA(BAA)CA(CA)) similar to Rondo form O A stepwise upward motion, all conjunct O B undulating motion (up and down) O C downward motion, the accompaniment is drone bass. Rhythm O Rubout robbed time means the performer will take some extra time in some spot and catch up in some other part. Passionate and direct music. German composer and a conductor O Made a living from conducting for quite a while Highly controversial fugue O Anti-Semitic O Left wing radical Ended up having to flee to Switzerland because of arrest warrant Financial difficulties always fleeing from creditors Music AAA Frederic Chopin By Arabian_456 O B- undulating motion (up and down) S Helped support him and to pay off some of his debt 1876 and large opera house (Effectiveness) was built for Wagers operas in Bayreuth, Bavaria Lots of affairs married twice and his 2nd wife, Cosmic, 26 years younger than him Composed more than dozen operas His music elicits strong reactions. You either hate him or love him as a figure and a composer Moved to Latvia, to work as a conductor. Munich under the patronage of Ludwig Died in Venice in 1883 in Italy. The Ring Cycle Comprised of 4 operas O The Rhine Gold O The Valerie O Siegfried O Twilight of the Gods All in German Libretti by Wagner, based on old Germanic legends O Gods, heroes and mythical creatures who fight over this magical ring that grants domination over the entire world. Didnt write the 4 operas in order but thats the order he prefers Monumental work over 15 hours to perform Worked on opera cycle over several decades The Lord of the Rings Similarities between LOTT and Ring cycle Each cycle consists of 4 works prequel and 3 main ones Both cycle begin in a state of innocence that is corrupted and then ultimately stored. Plot center on efforts to own and control the ring Ring hold great power but also brings on grief Giants, Dragons The Valerie, Act Ill Whatnots Farewell Best known for the beginning of Act Ill, The Ride of the Valerie Characters O Watson chief of the god O Brainchild his daughter; a warrior-like Valerie S Valhalla Actions Verdi vs.. Wagner Verdi Virtuosic vocal writing (Melissa) Wager The singer and the orchestra integrated; equal parts Syllabic vocal writing; very little text repetition O Wanted them to be more inherently dramatic O Like real life O Music dramas Wanted to be more faithful to the drama (Wagner described his operas as music dramas What happened on the stage is tangible reflection of what is going on in the music Gauntnesss O Sesame total, Skunks work of, were art O The orchestra needs to match the costumes, the costumes need to match the scene. O Integrating all of the parts into a whole Wagers term. O Leitmotif guiding motif A brief musical phrase associated with some person, event or idea in the drama Transformed depending in situation sad, happy, tragic